Well, part 1 of my mission has been completed and I'm feeling quite good at this time:) It's just been proven how 1 individual can single-handedly dance rings around the lame little blocks "Wikipedia" puts in place by rendering them ineffective hehehe:) I can't reveal too much information about what happened earlier because I was asked to keep things under wraps but you can be sure that "Wikipedia" has been shown how determination can override anything THEY put on the table;) Regarding the article in question that started it all (Helter Skelter (Manson scenario), I think the statements below posted in the "Talk" section of the article page says it best:
"First of all, this article is a 1-sided media sensationalized version of events. Second, "Wikipedia" should know better than to permit a biased view without any opposition whatsoever to be posted on this site. This shows a total lack of decency and ethics on their part! They expect people to come here and read their crap but God forbid if anyone objects to the content. That's a HUGE no-no in their eyes and you will be subjected to Nazi tactics from their end designed to protect their precious image. It doesn't matter if certain items on a particular page have been refuted by valid sources because all that matters is what "Wikipedia" and the many low-life individuals involved in the bullshit censorship choose to believe. THEIR word is apparently law and nobody better dare to go against that or else. It's amazing how they can take such a stance even after participating in the "black-out" in protest to "SOPA" and "PIPA" which is all about censorship. Talk about living a double standard! That's clearly what "Wikipedia" is all about and their participation during the "black-out" was just a ploy for attention period. I doubt they genuinely care about anyone else except THEMSELVES!"
Isn't it something how "Wikipedia" can actually participate in a protest against censorship but yet hypocritically inflict that same censorship onto others who don't happen to share THEIR point of view? Yes, that definitely is living a double standard on THEIR part. Of course, can we REALLY expect much better from a website that thrives on lies perpetrated by half-wits who lack the ability to properly construct unbiased articles? Unfortunately, "Wikipedia" no longer appears to be the most accurate source of information and clearly can NOT be trusted to deliver ALL the facts necessary for people to form unbiased opinions on. I think you're best to just do a Google search for whatever information you require and avoid "Wikipedia" entirely because it's obvious you're not going to get anything but sanitized bullshit otherwise. Trust me, I know! Stay tuned for further updates.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
